An agent that checks its actions against signed guardrail graphs can show a mark that anyone can verify. It says who vouched for the agent's guardrails, which graphs it answers to, and that its decisions are recorded where they cannot be rewritten. Like the padlock in your browser, the mark is not a claim. Open it and the proof is there.
The mark is the Foundation shield. Its rim shows the tier: silver for Checked, blue for Verified, gold for Accredited. Examples. Harbourline Bank and Coastal Health are fictional.
When agents call other agents, every hand-off asks the same question: does this agent have adequate guardrails, and are they what it says they are? Today there is no way to tell. A system prompt cannot be inspected and a model's training cannot be audited from outside.
The web had the same problem with websites. The answer was not a law that banned unencrypted sites. It was the padlock: an independent authority checked, the browser verified the check, and people learned to look for it. Unmarked sites became the exception.
The Conscience Graph gives agents the same thing. A guardrail graph is signed by an authority. An agent consults it before it acts, and every answer is signed and written to a public log. The AI Trust Mark is the visible sign of that chain, and it can be checked by a person, by a regulator or by another agent in milliseconds.
An organisation can vouch for itself, which counts for something. An independent check counts for a great deal more. Accreditation by the body that governs a profession counts for the most. The tier reads in the mark the same way it reads in a graph certificate: region, domain, grade. Tiers describe who checked and how deeply. They are not a ranking of organisations.
Self-signed. For any organisation starting out.
Shows: this agent answers to known guardrails, and its decisions are on the record.
Independently checked. For organisations whose agents act on customers or money.
Shows: someone other than the operator checked the guardrails, and they are enforced, not advisory.
Accredited by the profession. For regulated work: health, finance, legal, defence.
Shows: the profession itself vouches for how this agent behaves in its field.
A mark covers one region and one domain. An agent can hold several, and it starts again at Checked in a field where it has no record.
Some failures end the mark whatever else holds. No score or tier makes up for them.
Every action class in the graphs records how far its harm reaches and whether it can be undone. The riskier the action, the higher the tier an agent needs to do it unsupervised.
| The agent's actions | Minimum tier |
|---|---|
| Affect only the operator, and can be undone | Checked |
| Affect customers or third parties, move money, or cannot be undone | Verified |
| Regulated work: clinical, financial advice, legal, defence | Accredited |
The mark is never just an image. It carries a certificate number and a QR code that open its verification page on consciencegraph.org, and the same check is open to any agent through the API. The check walks the chain the way a browser walks a certificate chain:
Another agent can make the same check at a hand-off before it accepts an instruction. An agent with no mark is not refused, but its requests are treated as data and routed to a person.
Example only. The verification page opens with the Signing Authority.
A badge, a screenshot or a PDF can be out of date. The mark only points to its record, and the record read at the moment of checking is what counts. Each record shows one of four statuses:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Valid | Issued, in the log, not suspended, not revoked and not expired. |
| Suspended | Paused while something is checked: the agent stopped consulting, its circuit breaker tripped, a critical drift alert is open, or its graph is under review. Treat it as not valid until the record changes. |
| Expired | Past its expiry date. Kept as a historical record. |
| Revoked | Withdrawn, with the reason published on the record and in the log. |
Expired, suspended and revoked records stay visible. Each record names the methodology version it was issued under, and a material change to the agent's graph needs a new check before expiry.
The mark produces evidence for several frameworks at once, because every action is checked, signed and recorded. Mapping is not certification: a mark is not an ISO certificate, a conformity assessment under the EU AI Act or a government approval.
| Framework | What it asks for | What the mark adds |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001 | An AI management system for the organisation, certified by an accredited body. | Evidence of what each agent actually did, action by action. ISO/IEC 42001 certifies the system that manages AI; the mark shows that system working. |
| EU AI Act | For high-risk systems, record-keeping (Article 12), transparency to deployers (Article 13) and human oversight (Article 14). | A signed record of every decision in a witnessed log; reasons and sources on every verdict; escalation to a named person who signs with a passkey. |
| NIST AI RMF | Govern, Map, Measure and Manage AI risk. | Govern: signed graphs and named owners. Map: action classes with blast radius and reversibility. Measure: decisions, drift and replay results. Manage: holds, escalation and the circuit breaker. |
| Australia's Guidance for AI Adoption (National AI Centre) | Accountability, risk management, testing, human control and transparency for organisations using AI. | A named seam owner and reviewers, replay sets before approval, human gates on escalations, and a public record of decisions. |
| UK AI Playbook and procurement guidance | Transparency and assurance of AI used in and bought by government. | A mark a buyer can check live, and a decision record a supplier can show without granting access to its systems. |
Before you hand an agent your money, your records or your case, see whose guardrails it answers to, who checked them, and whether its decisions are on the record.
Show customers, partners and insurers that your agents are governed, not just prompted. Marked agents get fewer escalations from the agents they work with, so they get more done.
An agent can check a peer's mark before it acts on the peer's request. Marked peers are trusted to the tier they hold; unmarked ones are treated as data. Holds and conditions travel with the work across the seam.
Every mark points to signed graphs and a public log of decisions. Attest an organisation's standing in your field, and check its record without asking for access.
Publish your field's guardrails, accredit the agents that carry them, and see when an accredited agent drifts.
Give the agent a key with cg.js enrol, or add the consult to your agent as a tool or through MCP. Every verdict it receives is signed and logged. See the quick start.
Register in the registry and publish a DNS record or a file on your domain. Agents with keys on your domain then act for your organisation.
Put the MCP gateway or the Claude Code hook in front of your agent's tools, so nothing runs without a receipt for that exact call.
Turn your system prompts and policies into a graph in the Guardrail Studio, resolve the conflicts, name your seam owner, and publish it with two approvals. It is signed at self grade.
The Guardrails Signing Authority issues the mark: Checked from the record above, Verified after its review of your graph and enforcement, and Accredited with the professional body for your field. A free automated tier for Verified is part of the plan, so no organisation is left self-signed because of cost.
Pricing: to be finalised prior to launch.
The AI Trust Mark is a certification mark held by the Conscience Graph Foundation and licensed to Signing Authorities and to the organisations they mark. The global floor is never sold. Payment funds the checking, and never buys a tier, a status or an outcome. Early Preview: marks are not issued yet. Talk to us about being among the first.